Google Paid Links Myths Made Official
- 2 Comment
For all the whiners and crybabies wanting an explanation of why Google bitch-slapped them about a month ago and took away or degraded their pagerank, you should be happy to know that they have provided an official explanation.
Notice this:
Not all paid links violate our guidelines. Buying and selling links is a normal part of the economy of the web when done for advertising purposes, and not for manipulation of search results. Links purchased for advertising should be designated as such. This can be done in several ways, such as:
- Adding a rel=”nofollow” attribute to the <a> tag
- Redirecting the links to an intermediate page that is blocked from search engines with a robots.txt file
So it looks to be ok in selling links if you have the nofollow on them. I am sure this will stir up the blogosphere. Glad it is not one of my money making models. There’s just way to much bullshit to deal with.
Related posts:
- Sneaky Links – Meta Refresh Vs. PhP Redirect This is pretty basic and is used often by many...
- The Newsroom – News You Can Use – And Freaking Get Paid For It Hot Damn! I love the Internet! There are so many...
- Getting Paid To Blog – A Review Of PayPerPost I was checking out PayPerPost this morning as it could possibly...
- Want To Outsource To Freelancers Or Get Paid For Being One? {Disclaimer: The following post is based on observation and opinion....
- CPA Marketing Series – Page Sniping Google Placements This can be one of the easiest ways to get...
2 Comments on this post
Trackbacks
- V@ Gnaka.com said:
Well, the truth is most buyers of text links in the marketplace are doing so for the do follow backlink.
December 3rd, 2007 at 6:54 pm -
SkyWatcher said:
Why does Google think that most advertisers will buy links for “advertisement” and NOT SEO?
November 30th, 2008 at 9:48 am







