<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you hear about Google&#8217;s NEW rule?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Marketing At Warp Speed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: migraine causes</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-11482</link>
		<dc:creator>migraine causes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-11482</guid>
		<description>That is a good news, although it is old i didnot know about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good news, although it is old i didnot know about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ielts</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-11272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ielts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-11272</guid>
		<description>It is good news of course :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good news of course :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Domination</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9969</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Domination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9969</guid>
		<description>Hey man,

this is good news because those trademark restrictions were really defying the purposes of PPC. I&#039;ve been advertising on trademarks for a while now but i thought it was only the US that was allowed.

I only realised there were 150 countries on the list when i saw this post. Unfortunately your google docs link to the regions not investigated is dead. 

Here&#039;s the working URL http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=144298 in case you&#039;d like to update the post with it.

jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man,</p>
<p>this is good news because those trademark restrictions were really defying the purposes of PPC. I&#8217;ve been advertising on trademarks for a while now but i thought it was only the US that was allowed.</p>
<p>I only realised there were 150 countries on the list when i saw this post. Unfortunately your google docs link to the regions not investigated is dead. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the working URL <a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=144298" rel="nofollow">http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=144298</a> in case you&#8217;d like to update the post with it.</p>
<p>jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free article directory</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9928</link>
		<dc:creator>Free article directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9928</guid>
		<description>Google only open for 3 countries? maybe next year, the list will be expand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google only open for 3 countries? maybe next year, the list will be expand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus@earn money from home</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9543</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus@earn money from home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9543</guid>
		<description>Thanks for breaking the news.  I think this change is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for breaking the news.  I think this change is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tillison Consulting &#124; Google AdWords Specialists</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9083</link>
		<dc:creator>Tillison Consulting &#124; Google AdWords Specialists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9083</guid>
		<description>James spotted the real objective here, huh? Google profit. However, the trademark issue has been a constant source of pain for many of our clients who would not actually be infringing copyright by using marks in a descriptive way.

If you ask Google about this, they WILL NOT budge from their policy of insiting on a written declaration from the trademark owner stating that a specific advertiser may use the mark in ads.

(Which sounds like to me like many cases would end up in court to achieve it).

Roll on the policy change in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James spotted the real objective here, huh? Google profit. However, the trademark issue has been a constant source of pain for many of our clients who would not actually be infringing copyright by using marks in a descriptive way.</p>
<p>If you ask Google about this, they WILL NOT budge from their policy of insiting on a written declaration from the trademark owner stating that a specific advertiser may use the mark in ads.</p>
<p>(Which sounds like to me like many cases would end up in court to achieve it).</p>
<p>Roll on the policy change in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9082</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9082</guid>
		<description>I have seen some sick clashes for number one positions this week. This is a huge change that&#039;s going to cost a lot more advertising dollars for most of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen some sick clashes for number one positions this week. This is a huge change that&#8217;s going to cost a lot more advertising dollars for most of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Support Sydney</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9057</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Support Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9057</guid>
		<description>Some adjustment on the US policy and I guess other countries will follow suit in due course. BUT just because Google permits it, doesn’t mean it’s legal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some adjustment on the US policy and I guess other countries will follow suit in due course. BUT just because Google permits it, doesn’t mean it’s legal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stancje</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9015</link>
		<dc:creator>Stancje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9015</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s just a cosmetic change. Knowing google it&#039;ll all get back to normal pretty soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just a cosmetic change. Knowing google it&#8217;ll all get back to normal pretty soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Top Affiliate Marketing News Stories (May 15, 2009)</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-9011</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Top Affiliate Marketing News Stories (May 15, 2009)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-9011</guid>
		<description>[...] Did You Hear about Google’s NEW Rule? On Cash Tactics, Kris says, &#8220;Effective June 4th Google will no longer be protecting trademark terms.&#8221; That means you&#8217;ll be allowed to bid on your favorite music artists, celebrities, and brands. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did You Hear about Google’s NEW Rule? On Cash Tactics, Kris says, &#8220;Effective June 4th Google will no longer be protecting trademark terms.&#8221; That means you&#8217;ll be allowed to bid on your favorite music artists, celebrities, and brands. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing For Newbie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week’s Top Affiliate Marketing News Stories (May 15, 2009)</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-8995</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing For Newbie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week’s Top Affiliate Marketing News Stories (May 15, 2009)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-8995</guid>
		<description>[...] Did You Hear about Google’s NEW Rule? On Cash Tactics, Kris says, &#8220;Effective June 4th Google will no longer be protecting trademark terms.&#8221; That means you&#8217;ll be allowed to bid on your favorite music artists, celebrities, and brands. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did You Hear about Google’s NEW Rule? On Cash Tactics, Kris says, &#8220;Effective June 4th Google will no longer be protecting trademark terms.&#8221; That means you&#8217;ll be allowed to bid on your favorite music artists, celebrities, and brands. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keyword Research Service</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-8992</link>
		<dc:creator>Keyword Research Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-8992</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised about this at all.  Of course Google would want some of that advertising money.  Why would trade marks stop the mighty Google from making a buck?  This doesn&#039;t really affect me though.  Any trademarks that I would want to bid on are blocked by my advertisers as well.  They control the PPC keywords of their affiliates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised about this at all.  Of course Google would want some of that advertising money.  Why would trade marks stop the mighty Google from making a buck?  This doesn&#8217;t really affect me though.  Any trademarks that I would want to bid on are blocked by my advertisers as well.  They control the PPC keywords of their affiliates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-8990</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-8990</guid>
		<description>Dude - This is completely irrelevant. I just got off the phone with Google. The policy is that you CAN use trademarks as keywords, you just can&#039;t use them in the ad.

Nothing has changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude &#8211; This is completely irrelevant. I just got off the phone with Google. The policy is that you CAN use trademarks as keywords, you just can&#8217;t use them in the ad.</p>
<p>Nothing has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-8940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-8940</guid>
		<description>This is good news. I recall having to apply for an exception because i used the word &quot;time&quot; in my ad copy. It flagged it as a trademarked term, I suppose because of Time Magazine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news. I recall having to apply for an exception because i used the word &#8220;time&#8221; in my ad copy. It flagged it as a trademarked term, I suppose because of Time Magazine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tillison Consulting &#124; Google AdWords Specialists</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/05/12/did-you-hear-about-googles-new-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-8910</link>
		<dc:creator>Tillison Consulting &#124; Google AdWords Specialists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/?p=1160#comment-8910</guid>
		<description>Derek: Depends where you are for the moment
(see Google&#039;s recent post http://tinyurl.com/raldqf), some adjustment on the US policy and I guess other countries will follow suit in due course. BUT just because Google permits it, doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s legal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek: Depends where you are for the moment<br />
(see Google&#8217;s recent post <a href="http://tinyurl.com/raldqf)" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/raldqf)</a>, some adjustment on the US policy and I guess other countries will follow suit in due course. BUT just because Google permits it, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s legal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
