You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Subscribe by email and get blog updates, news, and more! Enter your email below.
Case Study Videos!
Categories
- Affiliate Marketing (137)
- Best Of The Week (16)
- Blogging News (26)
- Case Study (21)
- Company Spotlight (10)
- Contests (32)
- CPA Marketing (46)
- Email Marketing (6)
- Excuse Me For The Rant (17)
- Forum Marketing (5)
- General Blabbing (106)
- Google (9)
- Guest Post (3)
- Industry News (36)
- Landing Pages (9)
- Lead Generation And Networks (32)
- Market Research (5)
- Money & Investing (3)
- Motivation And Inspiration (7)
- PPC (68)
- Q & A (3)
- Reviews (13)
- SEO (17)
- Social Networks And Web 2.0 (29)
- Top Offers (3)
- Traffic Building And Tactics (33)
- Video (23)
- Zero To Hero Series (6)
Archives
- June 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (1)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (7)
- November 2009 (7)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (8)
- May 2009 (9)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (11)
- December 2008 (11)
- November 2008 (10)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (10)
- July 2008 (12)
- June 2008 (14)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (18)
- March 2008 (24)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (45)
- December 2007 (33)
- November 2007 (18)
- October 2007 (18)
- September 2007 (14)
- August 2007 (41)




Google Quality Score Questions Answered
Here are my responses to questions asked regarding quality score. There was not too many of them. SWEET! Less work for me haha. Seriously though, check the PPC Section of the forum for more in-depth conversations.
Personally since I use a lot of software and the Adwords Editor I tend to go for a lot of one keyword per adgroup type of campaigns. This requires contact with Google in getting the limits raised such as the 25 campaign limit and 50K keywords starting off. This also takes multiple accounts but so easy to track. If one adgroup is getting clicked on the so easy to scrub others that dont perform so well.
I stay away from adgroups with over 25 keywords if I am not doing singles. In my experience, it’s just not worth it. Spitting out landing pages per adgroup (keywords within) is the best way I have found to counter the QS.
Even with a quality site you can use Dynamic Keyword Insertion. Even though Dynamic Keyword Insertion may help you out with relevancy, it’s not going to effect your QS much. The better your CTR, the better your QS.
I provided some insight to this here –> http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/ … The short answer here is that if you want to try and game the system is to build a landing page specific for these keywords and try it that way. If they are getting slapped BEFORE you know if they are good keywords or not, I would suggest moving them and making a landing page for them specifically and see if you can get away with it. Generally you can. I try to NOT delete them if I possibly can. Deleting them and bringing them back is still going to bring back the historical nature of these keywords and probably effect you again down the road.
Totally off track here but your author box basically makes or breaks you with article marketing and people clicking over to wherever you want them to go. Make your author box very inquisitive. Make it mysterious. Ask a question. If all else fails, only post part of the article if you can and let people know they can read the rest over at your site. You need a call to action to get people from the author box to your site.
Read every part of this QS series. It’s not only about landing pages and keywords. Account history, keywords performance WORLD WIDE, all types of aspects to consider here. Google looks at your site and reads it NOT just your landing page when you go to setup your ads and the little optimizer box checks it over. Is the landing page relevant to the overall theme of the site. Do you have content? Do you have unique content that updates often? Links in, links out? Take a look at the overall structure of your site and work on it. You can always take everything to a new account and try it out, or even switch it all to a domain but that’s more of a short term fix. You should look at your entire structure and start talking here or in the forum on specifics.
I’ve blogged so many times on market research I dont know if I could do that again but I did create a separate category here for that purpose. Between that category, the PPC category and the CPA Series Category, I dont know how anyone could not make money. Many already are from the word of the forum. However, putting everything into a step by step format (maybe PDF) is probably a good idea because a lot of everything gets sidetracked.
A case study sounds good but it wont be over an offer that is currently profiting. I could do a past one easy. I gave up one of my sites a few months back and spawned a shitload of copycats that came back to bite me in the ass. But a case study is indeed a cool idea.
Not too many questions here but some good ones that came thru. You can follow more in-depth discussions in the forum.
Related posts: