<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPAM Series &#8211; Quality Score Rd 2 &#8211; Adwords Account And Quality Scores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Marketing At Warp Speed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adwords Make Money</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-10167</link>
		<dc:creator>Adwords Make Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-10167</guid>
		<description>Adwords a whole is a bit of a messy concept. It can be like a long winding road covered in thickets and poison ivy (at times) haha. Ruck, could I possibly feature your post on my new blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://adwordsmakemoney.vox.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adwords Make Money&lt;/a&gt; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adwords a whole is a bit of a messy concept. It can be like a long winding road covered in thickets and poison ivy (at times) haha. Ruck, could I possibly feature your post on my new blog <a href="http://adwordsmakemoney.vox.com" rel="nofollow">Adwords Make Money</a> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Adwords: It’s not all smiles and sunshine &#124; Philip J Mikal</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-9587</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Adwords: It’s not all smiles and sunshine &#124; Philip J Mikal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-9587</guid>
		<description>[...] CPAM Series &#8211; Quality Score Rd 2 &#8211; Adwords Account And Quality Scores [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CPAM Series &#8211; Quality Score Rd 2 &#8211; Adwords Account And Quality Scores [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO &#187; ????? ????? &#187; CPA-????????? — ??????? ? Adwords ? ?????????? ????????</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4656</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO &#187; ????? ????? &#187; CPA-????????? — ??????? ? Adwords ? ?????????? ????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4656</guid>
		<description>[...] ???????? ? CPA. ? ???? ?????? Ruck ???????????? ? ????? ?????????? ???????? ??????? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ???????? ? CPA. ? ???? ?????? Ruck ???????????? ? ????? ?????????? ???????? ??????? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anks</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>anks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Rocking Ruck,
                   I agree when u say about the quality of the landing page. Well this is the main reason some of the click bank product work very well with Ad words. Reason being, each product has a landing page with main keyword and stuffed with theme Keywords No wonder its spider food. 
                And for other affiliates that just have sort of product catelogue or just a small description abt the targeted product that ur redirecting to then u must route it through ur own well SEOed Landing page.
               No doubt understanding quality score is absolutely understand the Psychology of its trainers who train the SEs. Its merely common sense but quite uncommon.

Regards
Anks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rocking Ruck,<br />
                   I agree when u say about the quality of the landing page. Well this is the main reason some of the click bank product work very well with Ad words. Reason being, each product has a landing page with main keyword and stuffed with theme Keywords No wonder its spider food.<br />
                And for other affiliates that just have sort of product catelogue or just a small description abt the targeted product that ur redirecting to then u must route it through ur own well SEOed Landing page.<br />
               No doubt understanding quality score is absolutely understand the Psychology of its trainers who train the SEs. Its merely common sense but quite uncommon.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Anks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Quality Score Questions Answered &#124; Money Makers Network</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Quality Score Questions Answered &#124; Money Makers Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>[...] adgroup?  What are you doing when that happens to you? I provided some insight to this here –&gt; http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/ … The short answer here is that if you want to try and game the system is to build a landing page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] adgroup?  What are you doing when that happens to you? I provided some insight to this here –&gt; <a href="http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/" rel="nofollow">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/</a> … The short answer here is that if you want to try and game the system is to build a landing page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Quality Score Questions Answered &#124; Cash Tactics &#124; Ruck's Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Quality Score Questions Answered &#124; Cash Tactics &#124; Ruck's Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>[...] provided some insight to this here &#8211;&gt; http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/  &#8230; The short answer here is that if you want to try and game the system is to build a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provided some insight to this here &#8211;&gt; <a href="http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/ " rel="nofollow">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/ </a> &#8230; The short answer here is that if you want to try and game the system is to build a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>Yeah I&#039;ve noticed that adwords wants you to prove yourself before they start giving you lower bids which is not chill if your low on cash.

Another idea to build the history up is maybe start with some really cheap international traffic, then once your bids start dropping, switch to more profitable areas. Do you think that could work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;ve noticed that adwords wants you to prove yourself before they start giving you lower bids which is not chill if your low on cash.</p>
<p>Another idea to build the history up is maybe start with some really cheap international traffic, then once your bids start dropping, switch to more profitable areas. Do you think that could work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruck</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4405</guid>
		<description>Well personally, 

I break them up by network. All except Placement Targetting. My placement targetting campaigns are mashed together into an account. Since you can have as many as you want, it&#039;s really how comfortable you are and how you want to organize. But generally I will have an affiliate network on a search and a content campaign. Some of them are smashed together such as the smaller networks I have used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well personally, </p>
<p>I break them up by network. All except Placement Targetting. My placement targetting campaigns are mashed together into an account. Since you can have as many as you want, it&#8217;s really how comfortable you are and how you want to organize. But generally I will have an affiliate network on a search and a content campaign. Some of them are smashed together such as the smaller networks I have used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dangerlarson</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4404</link>
		<dc:creator>dangerlarson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4404</guid>
		<description>Ruck,

At what point do you start creating new accounts? Do you break them up by niche or just when you run out of campaigns/adgroups/etc in one? On the client side it&#039;s obvious where I would do that, but in aff? thanks, bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruck,</p>
<p>At what point do you start creating new accounts? Do you break them up by niche or just when you run out of campaigns/adgroups/etc in one? On the client side it&#8217;s obvious where I would do that, but in aff? thanks, bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruck</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>Nothing is safe. That&#039;s what I believe. There are multitudes of reasons and quality scores with Adwords. Ads, keywords, relevance, CTR, history. So many factors come into play when we are dealing with Adwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing is safe. That&#8217;s what I believe. There are multitudes of reasons and quality scores with Adwords. Ads, keywords, relevance, CTR, history. So many factors come into play when we are dealing with Adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PigNasty</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>PigNasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>Do you have any idea why even if your getting a good CTR (2% +-) they hammer your keywords? For instance I had one test campaign I only had 4 or 5 keywords on exact match. My top 2 keywords got hammered and the keywords that weren&#039;t doing so good didn&#039;t get touched. Everything ran fine for almost a whole week with little or no competition. I was getting no 1 or 2 position the whole time. They said they weren&#039;t relevant but I was getting plenty of clicks. Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any idea why even if your getting a good CTR (2% +-) they hammer your keywords? For instance I had one test campaign I only had 4 or 5 keywords on exact match. My top 2 keywords got hammered and the keywords that weren&#8217;t doing so good didn&#8217;t get touched. Everything ran fine for almost a whole week with little or no competition. I was getting no 1 or 2 position the whole time. They said they weren&#8217;t relevant but I was getting plenty of clicks. Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruck</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4400</guid>
		<description>low impressions to clicks thus a bad CTR. Even with a bad CTR you can still hammer home some keywords that convert. That&#039;s why it&#039;s always a judgement call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>low impressions to clicks thus a bad CTR. Even with a bad CTR you can still hammer home some keywords that convert. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s always a judgement call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rip</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores.html/comment-page-1#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>Rip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/04/10/cpam-series-quality-score-rd-2-adwords-account-and-quality-scores/#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>What would make you label keywords &quot;poor&quot; if they are converting and profitable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would make you label keywords &#8220;poor&#8221; if they are converting and profitable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

