<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneaky Links &#8211; Meta Refresh Vs. PhP Redirect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Marketing At Warp Speed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PPC++</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-10376</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC++</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-10376</guid>
		<description>Kris, when I first encountered your blog I read it from beginning to end.  Ironically I totally forgot about this page when I started making a PHP redirect entry on my newbie affiliate marketing blog until I re-discovered it through Google (I guess your SEO works ;)

Anyway I just wanted to give you props for the good work!  I also linked this post from my blog for anyone on my site that might want to read a bit more on the subject.

- Niko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris, when I first encountered your blog I read it from beginning to end.  Ironically I totally forgot about this page when I started making a PHP redirect entry on my newbie affiliate marketing blog until I re-discovered it through Google (I guess your SEO works ;)</p>
<p>Anyway I just wanted to give you props for the good work!  I also linked this post from my blog for anyone on my site that might want to read a bit more on the subject.</p>
<p>- Niko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-10150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-10150</guid>
		<description>&quot;Double meta refresh&quot; can guarantee that the original source is hidden.  The link goes to page1, which meta-refreshes to page2 which meta-refreshes to affiliate link.  The key difference is that page2 has php code to detect whether the referrer is blanked or not, and if by some chance it&#039;s not blanked (for whatever reason) the second refresh doesn&#039;t happen.  So even if a browser retains the referrer on meta-refresh, your original source isn&#039;t given away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Double meta refresh&#8221; can guarantee that the original source is hidden.  The link goes to page1, which meta-refreshes to page2 which meta-refreshes to affiliate link.  The key difference is that page2 has php code to detect whether the referrer is blanked or not, and if by some chance it&#8217;s not blanked (for whatever reason) the second refresh doesn&#8217;t happen.  So even if a browser retains the referrer on meta-refresh, your original source isn&#8217;t given away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 5 August Posts &#124; Cash Tactics</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-9677</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 5 August Posts &#124; Cash Tactics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-9677</guid>
		<description>[...] Sneaky Links &#8211; Meta Refresh Vs. PhP Redirect- This post is a Ruck original. During the end of 2007 beginning of 2008 many people were asking the questions on using a meta refresh. So Ruck went ahead and created a pretty useful post on using Meta Refresh or PHP redirects. Maybe I should create a post on different methods for blanking the referrer&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sneaky Links &#8211; Meta Refresh Vs. PhP Redirect- This post is a Ruck original. During the end of 2007 beginning of 2008 many people were asking the questions on using a meta refresh. So Ruck went ahead and created a pretty useful post on using Meta Refresh or PHP redirects. Maybe I should create a post on different methods for blanking the referrer&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhira &#124; Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-4625</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhira &#124; Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-4625</guid>
		<description>Does it have to be an html file? Will it work if you save it as a php file?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it have to be an html file? Will it work if you save it as a php file?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dankind &#187; Hiding the HTTP Referer with PHP, JS or Meta</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Dankind &#187; Hiding the HTTP Referer with PHP, JS or Meta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s been some talk recently in some blogs on the interwebs regarding cloaking/masking/hiding HTTP REFERERs to protect your traffic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s been some talk recently in some blogs on the interwebs regarding cloaking/masking/hiding HTTP REFERERs to protect your traffic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruck</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2033</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2033</guid>
		<description>Umm yea,

Which is why I don&#039;t really mess with it on Adwords. A simple redirect will do there. This is more focused on not showing that traffic is coming from Myspace, Facebook, Yahoo Answers.

I been making money for over a year with CJ using this and I have had zero problems. I watch my referrers in my CPA accounts too. No probs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm yea,</p>
<p>Which is why I don&#8217;t really mess with it on Adwords. A simple redirect will do there. This is more focused on not showing that traffic is coming from Myspace, Facebook, Yahoo Answers.</p>
<p>I been making money for over a year with CJ using this and I have had zero problems. I watch my referrers in my CPA accounts too. No probs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brill</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2032</link>
		<dc:creator>Brill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2032</guid>
		<description>So it cut out my code... but the way Ruck showed you will show up in CJ if it&#039;s your target URL in AdWords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it cut out my code&#8230; but the way Ruck showed you will show up in CJ if it&#8217;s your target URL in AdWords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brill</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Brill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>PHP Redirects using the  will show up in CJ as a Google referring URL  if you are using them in your AdWords target URL. Trust me from experience. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHP Redirects using the  will show up in CJ as a Google referring URL  if you are using them in your AdWords target URL. Trust me from experience. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruck</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>@ Terrence - Never used PhP refresh. I just stick to what I KNOW I can get away with. I&#039;m no techy so I just stick to the Meta. 

Pryda&#039;s tool looks awesome so I am going to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Terrence &#8211; Never used PhP refresh. I just stick to what I KNOW I can get away with. I&#8217;m no techy so I just stick to the Meta. </p>
<p>Pryda&#8217;s tool looks awesome so I am going to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>@pryda, thanks buddy.  gonna bookmark the site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pryda, thanks buddy.  gonna bookmark the site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>Ruck what about PHP Refresh? Does it work the same way with meta refresh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruck what about PHP Refresh? Does it work the same way with meta refresh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>Yo ruck great post!

Pryda - thanks for sharing.
Emilian - thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo ruck great post!</p>
<p>Pryda &#8211; thanks for sharing.<br />
Emilian &#8211; thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pryda</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>Pryda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>@Mike: No, the referrer information is not displayed. 

I must say that I haven&#039;t tried it in all browsers. I read somewhere that Opera (or was it another browser?) sometimes still shows referrer information, even on meta refreshes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike: No, the referrer information is not displayed. </p>
<p>I must say that I haven&#8217;t tried it in all browsers. I read somewhere that Opera (or was it another browser?) sometimes still shows referrer information, even on meta refreshes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilian</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>If anybody wants a solution that they can host themselves, check out http://ultimatelinkcloaker.com 

It does a bit more than just simple redirection, it also track your keywords. Plus it is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anybody wants a solution that they can <a href="http://cashtactics.net/recommends/HostGator" style="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >host</a> themselves, check out <a href="http://ultimatelinkcloaker.com" rel="nofollow">http://ultimatelinkcloaker.com</a> </p>
<p>It does a bit more than just simple redirection, it also track your keywords. Plus it is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruck</title>
		<link>http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect.html/comment-page-1#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashtactics.net/01/07/sneaky-links-meta-refresh-vs-php-redirect/#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>@ Mike -- Caught you in my Askimet for some reason so you should be fine for commenting now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike &#8212; Caught you in my Askimet for some reason so you should be fine for commenting now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
